Concepts

Branch merging restrictions are an essential aspect of implementing a successful DevOps workflow. By using branch policies and branch protections, development teams can ensure that code merges into the master branch are of high quality and meet the necessary criteria. In this article, we will explore how to implement branch merging restrictions using these features in Microsoft DevOps Solutions.

Branch Policies:

Branch policies allow development teams to define rules and conditions that need to be met before merging code into a specific branch. These policies act as a safety net, preventing low-quality code or unreviewed changes from being merged into critical branches like the master branch. Let’s take a look at some of the commonly used branch policies.

  1. Code Review:

    Code reviews play a crucial role in ensuring code quality and promoting collaboration among team members. With the code review policy, developers can specify that all changes must go through a review process before they can be merged. This policy is often associated with pull requests, where team members can provide feedback and approve or reject the proposed changes.

    To enable this policy, navigate to the Branches section in your repository settings. Select the desired branch, such as the master branch, and enable the code review policy. Specify the minimum number of reviewers required and whether they should approve changes before merging.

  2. Build Validation:

    Build validation policies ensure that code being merged into a branch passes certain build and test criteria. By defining build pipelines, which include compilation, testing, and other automated tasks, developers can ensure that the code meets the expected standards. The build validation policy prevents code with build errors or failing tests from being merged.

    To configure this policy, go to the branch’s settings and enable build validation. Select the appropriate pipeline that needs to be executed before merging. If the build or tests fail, the system prevents the merge until the issues are fixed.

Branch Protections:

While branch policies focus on defining rules for code merging, branch protections provide additional safeguards to prevent accidental or unauthorized changes. These protections ensure that only authorized individuals can modify critical branches and that specific safety measures are in place. Let’s explore some common branch protections.

  1. Required Checks:

    With required checks, you can enforce that specific validation steps must pass before a pull request can be merged. These checks could include code reviews, builds, tests, or any other custom checks defined within the pipelines.

    To enable required checks, navigate to the branch’s settings and select the “Branch protection rules” section. Add a new rule, specify the required checks, and set the required status checks before merging. This ensures that all the necessary validations are completed successfully before allowing the merge.

  2. Force Push Protection:

    Force pushing allows overwriting history in a branch, which can lead to data loss or unintended changes. By enabling force push protection, you can prevent accidental or unauthorized force pushes to critical branches like the master branch.

    To enable force push protection, go to the branch’s settings and add a new rule in the “Branch protection rules” section. Enable the “Prevent force push” option to restrict force pushing, ensuring that branch history remains intact.

By combining branch policies and branch protections, development teams can implement robust branch merging restrictions, promoting code quality, collaboration, and ensuring the stability of critical branches. It is important to tailor these restrictions to the specific needs and policies of your organization.

Remember, effective branch merging restrictions are crucial for successful DevOps implementations. By implementing these features in Microsoft DevOps Solutions, you can create a well-defined workflow that fosters collaboration, quality, and stability in your software development lifecycle.

Answer the Questions in Comment Section

Which of the following actions can be restricted by using branch policies and protections?

a) Force pushing to a protected branch
b) Deleting a protected branch
c) Merging a protected branch into another branch
d) All of the above

Correct answer: d) All of the above

True or False: Branch policies and protections can only be applied to the main branch.

Correct answer: False

Which type of branch protection rule prevents direct pushes to a branch?

a) Require pull request reviews
b) Build validation
c) Require branch policies
d) Require status checks

Correct answer: c) Require branch policies

Which branch protection rule enforces a successful build before allowing changes to be merged?

a) Work item linking
b) Require status checks
c) Require signed commits
d) Require reviewers

Correct answer: b) Require status checks

When creating a branch policy, which option allows specific users or groups to bypass the policy?

a) Required reviewers
b) Work item linking
c) Dismiss stale pull request approvals when new changes are pushed
d) Exclude branches option

Correct answer: d) Exclude branches option

Multiple select: Which of the following actions can be enforced before a pull request can be completed? (Select all that apply)

a) Required reviewers
b) Work item linking
c) Require linked work items to be closed on completion
d) Build validation
e) Enable status checks

Correct answers: a) Required reviewers, c) Require linked work items to be closed on completion, d) Build validation, e) Enable status checks

True or False: Branch policies can prevent commits that do not satisfy specific criteria from being pushed to a branch.

Correct answer: True

Which branch protection rule allows pull requests to be automatically completed when they meet specific conditions?

a) Required reviewers
b) Merge method
c) Dismiss stale pull request approvals when new changes are pushed
d) Minimum number of reviewers

Correct answer: c) Dismiss stale pull request approvals when new changes are pushed

When configuring a branch policy, which option enforces a specific reviewer or group of reviewers for each pull request?

a) Require a minimum number of reviewers
b) Reset all approvals when new changes are pushed
c) Require a successful build
d) Check for linked work items

Correct answer: a) Require a minimum number of reviewers

True or False: Branch policies can be configured to block specific types of files from being committed to a branch.

Correct answer: True

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
سارا کامروا
8 months ago

Great insights on branch merging restrictions. This is really beneficial for maintaining code quality.

Đurađ Miljković
1 year ago

Thanks for the detailed explanation!

Jovana Maksimović
1 year ago

Can someone explain how branch protections help in a continuous integration/continuous deployment pipeline?

Kate Barrett
1 year ago

Does anyone have experience with branch merging restrictions in large scale projects?

Luis Terry
1 year ago

Interesting read, but isn’t a bit cumbersome to implement these restrictions in smaller teams?

Imogen Cooper
9 months ago

How does one set up branch policies in Azure Repos?

Matthieu Moreau
1 year ago

This blog post helped me understand the necessity of branch protections in DevOps.

Eitel Derksen
9 months ago

While the concept is good, some teams might find the restrictions too stringent. Any thoughts?

22
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x