Tutorial / Cram Notes

Amazon ECS is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers. ECS allows you to run applications on a managed cluster of EC2 instances. It’s an excellent choice for standard Docker applications, particularly if you’re already comfortable with AWS.

Key Features:

  • Tight integration with AWS services such as Elastic Load Balancing, Amazon VPC, IAM, and Amazon CloudWatch.
  • ECS is AWS-native and does not require installation and operation of container orchestration software.

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)

AWS EKS is a managed service that runs Kubernetes without requiring the installation and operation of Kubernetes management infrastructure. If you’re using Kubernetes or you’re looking to use Kubernetes because of its strong community support and vast ecosystem, EKS is the appropriate choice.

Key Features:

  • Automated Kubernetes version upgrades and patching.
  • Integrates with AWS services with the support for AWS networking and security.
  • It abstracts away the complexity of managing the Kubernetes control plane.

AWS Fargate

AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers that works with both ECS and EKS. It eliminates the need to manage servers or clusters. Use Fargate if you want to focus on application development rather than infrastructure management.

Key Features:

  • No need to manage EC2 instances; AWS manages the nodes for you.
  • Simplified scaling operations—Fargate manages the task or pod execution and scaling.

Choosing the Right Service

To select the appropriate service, one should consider a range of factors including:

  • Control vs Ease of Use: Choose ECS if you want easier integration with AWS and straightforward management. Opt for EKS if you need the robust features of Kubernetes and a broad ecosystem. For the simplest operational model, regardless of orchestration, choose Fargate.
  • Performance Requirements: All services are designed to support high-performance requirements, though ECS and self-managed EKS allow for more fine-tuning of the underlying EC2 instances.
  • Networking: ECS and EKS offer powerful networking options, with Kubernetes providing a more granular level of control over network policies.
  • Security: AWS services are built with security in mind. ECS and EKS integrate with IAM for fine-grained access control.
  • Cost: Fargate pricing is based on the vCPU and memory resources used. ECS and EKS have costs related to the compute (EC2 instances) and EKS has an additional charge for each Kubernetes control plane you run.

Here’s a simplified comparison table to illustrate the primary service differences:

Feature ECS EKS Fargate
Management Model AWS-managed AWS-managed Serverless/AWS-managed
Orchestration Proprietary (AWS) Kubernetes ECS or EKS based
Control Plane AWS managed AWS managed AWS managed
Worker Nodes Self-managed Self-managed AWS managed
Networking AWS-native + VPC Kubernetes + VPC AWS-native + VPC
Security IAM Roles IAM Roles IAM Roles
Scaling Manual/Auto Manual/Auto Auto
Pricing Model EC2 Instances EC2 Instances + Control Plane vCPU and Memory Resources

Use Cases Examples

  • Highly controlled environment: An enterprise that requires fine-grained control over its environment for compliance reasons might prefer an ECS with self-managed EC2 instances or an EKS cluster with EC2 worker nodes.
  • Focus on application development: A startup might favor AWS Fargate with ECS due to the reduced overhead in infrastructure management, allowing their team to focus on building and deploying applications.

In conclusion, the selection of the appropriate container service depends on your specific needs for control, integration, and management. As you prepare for the SAP-C02 exam, ensure you understand the details, features, and trade-offs of each service so you can make informed decisions when designing solutions on AWS.

Practice Test with Explanation

True or False: Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) allows you to run containers directly on bare-metal servers without using virtual machines.

  • False

Explanation: Amazon ECS allows you to run containers on AWS, but it does this by managing the container orchestration on your behalf, either on virtual machines managed by AWS Fargate or on EC2 instances which are virtual machines, not bare-metal servers.

True or False: AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine that allows you to run containers without managing servers or clusters.

  • True

Explanation: AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers that removes the need to provision and manage servers or clusters for running containerized applications.

Which AWS service would you use for a managed Kubernetes service?

  • a) Amazon ECS
  • b) Amazon EKS
  • c) AWS Batch
  • d) AWS Fargate

Answer: b) Amazon EKS

Explanation: Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) is the managed service that provides a scalable and highly-available Kubernetes control plane for running Kubernetes applications on AWS.

Which AWS service automatically scales the number of Amazon EC2 instances during demand spikes to maintain performance and decrease capacity during lulls to reduce costs?

  • a) AWS Auto Scaling
  • b) AWS Elastic Beanstalk
  • c) AWS Fargate
  • d) Amazon ECS

Answer: a) AWS Auto Scaling

Explanation: AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost.

True or False: AWS Fargate supports both Amazon ECS and Amazon EKS.

  • True

Explanation: AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine that can be used with both Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS).

What is the main benefit of using AWS Fargate with Amazon ECS over using Amazon ECS with EC2 instances?

  • a) Lower costs for large clusters
  • b) More granular control over the underlying infrastructure
  • c) Elimination of the need to manage the underlying instances
  • d) Support for Windows containers

Answer: c) Elimination of the need to manage the underlying instances

Explanation: AWS Fargate with Amazon ECS provides the benefit of not having to manage the underlying instances, thus simplifying the deployment and management of containers.

True or False: AWS Elastic Beanstalk is an ideal service for running and scaling containerized applications with complex architecture.

  • False

Explanation: AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) that automates the deployment, scaling, and management of applications. It’s more suited for simple to moderate application architectures and might not be the best choice for complex containerized applications that require fine-grained control and management.

Which service is more appropriate for batch processing workloads in AWS?

  • a) AWS Step Functions
  • b) AWS Batch
  • c) Amazon ECS
  • d) AWS Lambda

Answer: b) AWS Batch

Explanation: AWS Batch enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch processing jobs on AWS.

True or False: AWS Fargate provides a built-in comprehensive security model that ensures container isolation by design.

  • True

Explanation: AWS Fargate provides strong isolation by design, so each container’s resources are isolated and cannot be accessed by other containers, regardless of whether they are part of the same task or service.

When would you choose Amazon ECS over AWS Lambda for container management?

  • a) When you need long-running processes
  • b) For event-driven, short-duration functions
  • c) When your workload is stateless and request-driven
  • d) For small-scale, low-complexity applications

Answer: a) When you need long-running processes

Explanation: Amazon ECS is more suitable for long-running processes compared to AWS Lambda, which has time limits on the execution of function code and is more suited for short, event-driven functions.

Interview Questions

Can you explain the key differences between Amazon ECS and Amazon EKS, and how would you choose between the two for container orchestration?

Amazon ECS (Elastic Container Service) is a proprietary AWS container management service that supports Docker containers and allows you to run applications on a managed cluster of Amazon EC2 instances, or by using AWS Fargate to eliminate the need to manage servers. Amazon EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service), on the other hand, is a managed service that makes it easy to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes control plane. EKS is a good choice when you need deep Kubernetes integration or when your development team is already familiar with Kubernetes. ECS is often preferred for simpler orchestration needs or tight integration with AWS services and IAM.

How does AWS Fargate change the way you would architect containerized applications on AWS?

AWS Fargate allows you to run containers without managing servers or clusters. With Fargate, there’s no need to provision, configure, or scale clusters of virtual machines to run containers, which simplifies the architecture. This enables a developer to focus on application design and business logic without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. When architecting applications with Fargate, consider the granularity of your services, suitable sizing for tasks, and how to manage networking and security, given the abstraction of underlying resources.

What factors should be taken into account when determining the scaling strategy for a containerized application on AWS?

Factors to consider for the scaling strategy include: the application’s workload patterns (predictable or unpredictable traffic), the scaling metric that best reflects the application load (CPU utilization, memory usage, custom metrics, etc.), the performance and cost objectives, the need for rapid scaling, and integration with other AWS services. For instance, ECS services can be scaled automatically using CPU and memory-based metrics, while EKS might use the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPAS) based on custom metrics provided by Kubernetes metrics server. Also important are the upper and lower bounds of scaling to manage cost and ensure availability.

What are the considerations for choosing instance types when deploying a containerized workload on Amazon EC2 instances with ECS?

When selecting instance types for ECS on EC2, you should consider the workload requirements such as CPU and memory needs, the network performance, if your application requires special hardware such as GPU or high I/O performance, and the balance between cost and performance. It is also important to consider the ECS agent and Docker resources, as well as headroom for the operating system and any other critical processes. The choice should provide enough resources to handle the peak demand without significant waste.

How can you implement CI/CD for containerized applications using AWS services?

You can implement CI/CD for containerized applications using AWS tools such as AWS CodePipeline for orchestration, AWS CodeBuild for building and testing code, and AWS CodeDeploy for automated deployment. Integrate these tools with Amazon ECR for Docker image storage and scanning, and then deploy to either ECS or EKS. Use infrastructure as code with AWS CloudFormation or AWS CDK to ensure consistent, repeatable deployments.

When securing containerized workloads on AWS, what services and practices should you consider?

When securing containerized workloads, consider using Amazon ECR for private container image repositories, enabling image scanning for vulnerabilities, and using AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles for ECS Task Roles and EKS Pod Service Accounts to manage permissions. Additionally, employ network isolation using VPC, security groups, and NACLs. Consider using AWS Secrets Manager or Parameter Store to manage secrets and credentials, enforcing the principle of least privilege, and employing end-to-end encryption for data in transit and at rest. Implementing automated compliance checks with AWS Config and monitoring the environment with Amazon CloudWatch and AWS CloudTrail is also crucial.

What AWS service would you recommend for a stateful containerized application requiring persistent storage? How would you configure it?

For stateful applications on ECS, you can use Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) or Elastic Block Store (EBS) for persistent storage. For EKS, you might also consider using EBS or EFS via the Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver to integrate persistent storage with your Kubernetes pods. Configure EBS volumes as persistent volume claims (PVCs) for individual pods, and use EFS when you need shared filesystem storage accessible by multiple pods. It’s essential to consider data durability, I/O performance needs, and the specific access patterns of your application.

How do you handle logging and monitoring for containerized services on AWS?

For logging, AWS provides Amazon CloudWatch Logs for capturing, monitoring, and storing log files from ECS and EKS. You can configure your container instances to send logs to CloudWatch or other third-party solutions that integrate with AWS. Additionally, for monitoring, use Amazon CloudWatch metrics and alarms to track the performance of your containerized services. You can also enable Container Insights for enhanced container-level monitoring, and integrate EKS with open-source tools like Prometheus and Grafana for Kubernetes-specific monitoring.

When would you choose AWS Fargate Spot instances for your containerized workloads, and what are the best practices to avoid disruption?

AWS Fargate Spot instances are suitable for stateless, fault-tolerant, and flexible containerized applications that can handle interruptions, such as batch processing jobs or development and test workloads. Best practices to avoid disruption include implementing checkpointing, having a reliable retry mechanism, using diversified spot capacity (across different instance types and availability zones), and combining Spot with On-Demand and/or Reserved Instances to ensure capacity availability.

How do you ensure high availability for a containerized web application deployed with Amazon ECS?

To ensure high availability for a web application on ECS, deploy the application across multiple Availability Zones. Utilize an Application Load Balancer (ALB) to distribute incoming traffic evenly among container instances and configure the ECS service for auto-scaling to handle varying loads. Implement health checks for the ALB to ensure that traffic is routed only to healthy container instances. Also, use an Amazon RDS or Amazon Aurora database with multi-AZ deployment, and ensure that your container instances are registered to an ECS cluster that spans multiple Availability Zones.

What role does Amazon ECR play in managing container deployments, and how can it be leveraged to streamline the application deployment process?

Amazon ECR (Elastic Container Registry) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easier for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. It can be leveraged to streamline the deployment process by supporting image vulnerability scanning, lifecycle policy management for image retention, and fine-grained access control using AWS IAM. This integration with AWS services simplifies the CI/CD pipeline, allows for quick retrieval of container images, and improves the security of your containerized applications.

Describe how you would scale a high-traffic application using AWS’s container services during a flash sale or similar event where traffic is expected to spike.

For scaling a high-traffic application during a spike, use an auto-scaling policy tied to metrics that represent load (e.g., CPU, request count) with an Application Load Balancer or Network Load Balancer to distribute incoming traffic. Configure ECS services or Kubernetes deployments to rapidly scale out with additional tasks or pods to handle the increased load. Utilize Fargate or an optimized EC2 strategy to ensure that you can scale quickly. If using EKS, utilize the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler and Cluster Autoscaler. Pre-warm the application by increasing the desired count or replicas in advance of the event and enable AWS Shield for DDoS protection.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phillip Stevens
9 months ago

This blog post on selecting the correct service for containers in the AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional exam is incredibly helpful!

Amy Sutton
9 months ago

I appreciate the detailed comparison between ECS and EKS. It really clarifies when to choose which service.

اميرعلي جعفری

Thanks for this blog post! It’s exactly what I needed to solidify my understanding.

Iida Latt
9 months ago

The blog didn’t go into enough detail about Fargate. It would have been helpful to get more insights.

Phoebe Williams
9 months ago

For high availability and scalability, would you recommend EKS over ECS?

Martha Bradley
9 months ago

Great post! I now understand that choosing between ECS and EKS largely depends on the operational model and complexity of the applications.

Berthold Hahne
9 months ago

Very informative. Can someone explain how integrating CI/CD pipelines differs between ECS and EKS?

Phoebe Williams
9 months ago

This blog is amazing. Cleared a lot of my doubts for the exam.

22
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x